Comments on: hillary clinton and the women abandoning women syndrome

By: lidiaohlidia

lidiaohlidia — Thu, 28 Feb 2008 21:44:19 +0000

dear “sandra gilbert and susan gubar” (clever cover, by the way). i devoted a whole entry to answering your question. it’s called “what comes.”
love lidia

By: Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar

Sandra Gilbert and Susan Gubar — Tue, 26 Feb 2008 17:13:03 +0000

Jesus fucking Christ when did you get so self-indulgent? when I first read “Chronology of Water” I was blown away by the way you had turned these events into fucking art, into something that redefined tragedy, hurt, woman, and gestured brilliantly towards something that might get us beyond this paradigm. But now it’s all about fucking self-pity. When did you start playing the victim?

By: lidiaohlidia

lidiaohlidia — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 16:03:37 +0000

trev:

that’s exactly how i like you. h.o.b.

love lid

By: trevor

trevor — Sat, 16 Feb 2008 05:00:54 +0000

i am already a bastard. and old. as for horny, leave me alone already; i got some surfing to do on redtube.com….

By: tetra

tetra — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 20:46:16 +0000

i like the term, horny elder

By: lidiaohlidia

lidiaohlidia — Fri, 15 Feb 2008 15:36:40 +0000

yes it’s the old divide and conquer motif. american power elites have used it since, oh, we got here and turned our rude visit into “discovery.”
you’d think more people would see through it by now.
sigh.

and trevor. you are a horny bastard.

wait 10 more years and you’ll be a horny OLD bastard like me.

By: tetra

tetra — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 18:52:47 +0000

i think a culture that promotes fighting between groups of people as a way to prevent organized efforts to overthrow the status-quo, is strange. it’s not something i think is healthy or should be considered normative. it’s true that’s it’s nothing new. and it’s true that it’s how things ‘are’. and it’s true that it’s a political device to prevent the organization of groups against the things that oppress them (as we see not just with women, but blacks/mexicans/asians fighting against each other instead of against white supremacist phalocentric culture, or americans blaming muslims for their lack of freedom instead of taking full stock of their own government, or poor or middle class white people thinking affirmative action takes money away from them instead of realizing blacks aren’t the enemy, it’s people in power who control distribution of resources that there’s an actual overabundance of). our gaze has definitely been intentionally directed away from where it needs to be, though as common as it is, it’s something that still stands out in my mind like a giant red ball in the middle of arctic snow.

By: trevor

trevor — Thu, 14 Feb 2008 17:07:46 +0000

Easy now, Shanester. Us daddies loves us some porno a mighty fierce.

By: lidiaohlidia

lidiaohlidia — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 23:46:39 +0000

well said.

By: shane

shane — Wed, 13 Feb 2008 17:00:18 +0000

i don’t think the infighitng among women promoted by this slick-shit mesmer menagerie is strange, necessarily. it’s a pretty common technique to divide any group which would be frighteningly powerful if it pulled itself together and punched this dominant dickless patricentric pornoculture in the bridge of its upturned nose…